Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Nika Radisic vs Lilli Tagger Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Radisic vs Tagger analysis and find out who is favored!
Nika Radisic vs Lilli Tagger Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Radisic 1 - 0 Tagger
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Radisic has won 44.31% of points on their second serve, while Tagger has won 45.03%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Radisic, in recent form, has won 53.8% of their opponent's second serve points, while Tagger has won 54.63%. The same stats for first serve returns are 42.26% and 33.03% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Radisic has saved 43.95% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Tagger has saved 41.46% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Radisic has won 58.11% of matches played (W/L 43/ 31), with Tagger winning 53.33% (W/L 8/ 7) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Radisic has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 57% (W/L 166/ 126), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 36% (W/L 5/ 9). Tagger has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 64% (W/L 7/ 4), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 33% (W/L 4/ 8).
- Player level: In the last year, Radisic has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 58.11% of matches (W/L 43/ 31), where as Tagger has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 63.64% of matches (W/L 7/ 4). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Radisic winning 1 times and Tagger being victorious 0 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Radisic winning 2 and Tagger winning 0. The last match between Radisic and Tagger was at the W35 Villach, 14-05-2024, First, Clay with Nika Radisic getting the victory 6-3 7-6(11).
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 2:12:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Radisic and Tagger have played a deciding set 0 times, with Radisic winning 0 times and Tagger 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 1 tiebreaks against each other with Radisic winning 1, and Tagger 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Radisic has played against opponents with an average rank of 263.03 while Tagger has played against players with an average rank of 156.33.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Radisic has won 44% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Tagger has won 25% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Radisic has converted 48.5% of breakpoint opportunities, and Tagger has converted 60% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
- If you are interested in models that predict tennis matches, this article is a good start (Warning: Stats geeks only)
388
Rank
367
High
24
Age
Plays
1
Total0
0
Hard0
1
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
N/A
Rank
High
16
Age
Plays
W
W
L
W
W
L
W
L
L
L
Form
W
W
W
L
L
W
L
L
W
L
55% (177-143)
Career Total W/L
48% (13-14)
46% (13-15)
YTD W/L
33% (2-4)
$0
Career Prize Money
$0
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
The Best Odds For Nika Radisic vs Lilli Tagger For Any Market:
We highly recommend you open accounts with at least 3 Bookmakers as depending on the match, odds can vary a lot between them, and always getting the best odds available will improve your profitability a lot in the long run. We recommend these Sportsbooks for you so sign up now! Check the current best odds by clicking the Sportsbook links below:
Sportsbooks & Bookies Promo Codes For Radisic VS Tagger
Sportsbook
Offer
| stats | Nika Radisic | Lilli Tagger |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
| Sets Won | 2 | 0 |
| Games Won | 13 | 9 |
| Aces (Total) | 0 | 0 |
| DFs Total | 0 | 3 |
| Avg Match Time | 2:12:0 | 2:12:0 |
| 1st Serve % | 66% (46/70) | 53% (40/76) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 67% (31/46) | 60% (24/40) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 67% (16/24) | 64% (23/36) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 75% (3/4) | 100% (1/1) |
| Return Points W% | 38% (29/76) | 33% (23/70) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-3 7-6(11) |
Stats 
Nika Radisic
Player
Lilli Tagger
66%
(
46 of
70)
1st Serve %
53%
(
40 of
76)
-
Aces
-
0
Double Faults
3
67%
(
31 of
46)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
24 of
40)
67%
(
16 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
64%
(
23 of
36)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
33%
(
23 of
70)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
29 of
76)
76
Total Points Won
70
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Nika Radisic | Lilli Tagger |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 46% (13/15) | 33% (2/4) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 48% (30/33) | 36% (5/9) |
| Games Win/Loss | 49% (280/294) | 43% (59/77) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 33% (1/2) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 46% (11/13) | 33% (1/2) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 50% (2/2) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.11 | 0.15 |
| Aces Total | 31 | 10 |
| DFs per game | 0.21 | 0.25 |
| DFs Total | 59 | 17 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:40:37 | 1:38:50 |
| Avg Opp Rank | 241.71 | 191.83 |
| 1st Serve % | 62% (1058/1717) | 56% (195/346) |
| 1st Serve W% | 56% (591/1058) | 58% (114/195) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 44% (292/659) | 45% (68/151) |
| BPs Won% Total | 48% (113/233) | 60% (15/25) |
| Return Pts W% | 46% (834/1801) | 40% (131/326) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 46% (13/15) | 33% (1/2) |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 33% (1/2) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 46% (13/28) | 33% (2/6) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 60% (3/5) | 0% (0/1) |
| Deciding Set W% | 43% (3/7) | 50% (1/2) |
| 1st set W, W | 80% (15/12) | 67% (3/2) |
| 1st set W, L | 20% (15/3) | 33% (3/1) |
| 1st set L, W | 8% (13/1) | 0% (3/0) |
Nika Radisic Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Panna Udvardy
Player
Nika Radisic
44%
(
43 of
97)
1st Serve %
52%
(
34 of
66)
4
Aces
2
9
Double Faults
5
60%
(
26 of
43)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
24 of
34)
56%
(
30 of
54)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
14 of
32)
100%
(
4 of
4)
Break Points Won
17%
(
2 of
12)
42%
(
41 of
97)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
28 of
66)
84
Total Points Won
79
|
6-4 7-5 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Maria Timofeeva
Player
Nika Radisic
63%
(
50 of
79)
1st Serve %
56%
(
41 of
73)
0
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
2
60%
(
30 of
50)
1st Serve Won
46%
(
19 of
41)
41%
(
12 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
28%
(
9 of
32)
58%
(
7 of
12)
Break Points Won
45%
(
5 of
11)
47%
(
37 of
79)
Rtn Points Won
62%
(
45 of
73)
87
Total Points Won
65
|
7-6(1) 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Eszter Meri
Player
Nika Radisic
70%
(
53 of
76)
1st Serve %
59%
(
47 of
79)
0
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
2
57%
(
30 of
53)
1st Serve Won
38%
(
18 of
47)
35%
(
8 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
14 of
32)
60%
(
9 of
15)
Break Points Won
58%
(
7 of
12)
50%
(
38 of
76)
Rtn Points Won
59%
(
47 of
79)
85
Total Points Won
70
|
3-6 6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Nika Radisic
Player
Ana Sofia Sanchez
57%
(
48 of
84)
1st Serve %
72%
(
49 of
68)
1
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
2
63%
(
30 of
48)
1st Serve Won
49%
(
24 of
49)
39%
(
14 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
8 of
19)
58%
(
7 of
12)
Break Points Won
31%
(
5 of
16)
48%
(
40 of
84)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
36 of
68)
80
Total Points Won
72
|
6-4 7-5 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Sofia Costoulas
Player
Nika Radisic
55%
(
29 of
53)
1st Serve %
65%
(
39 of
60)
1
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
1
69%
(
20 of
29)
1st Serve Won
46%
(
18 of
39)
50%
(
12 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
7 of
21)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
40%
(
21 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
35 of
60)
67
Total Points Won
46
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Nika Radisic
Player
Daniela Vismane
76%
(
69 of
91)
1st Serve %
56%
(
54 of
97)
1
Aces
0
5
Double Faults
1
57%
(
39 of
69)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
32 of
54)
45%
(
10 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
18 of
43)
35%
(
6 of
17)
Break Points Won
56%
(
5 of
9)
46%
(
42 of
91)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
47 of
97)
96
Total Points Won
92
|
2-6 6-2 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Nika Radisic
Player
Alina Granwehr
64%
(
29 of
45)
1st Serve %
50%
(
18 of
36)
1
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
7
79%
(
23 of
29)
1st Serve Won
44%
(
8 of
18)
50%
(
8 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
6 of
18)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
31%
(
14 of
45)
Rtn Points Won
61%
(
22 of
36)
53
Total Points Won
28
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Valeriya Strakhova
Player
Nika Radisic
80%
(
65 of
81)
1st Serve %
60%
(
32 of
53)
-
Aces
-
2
Double Faults
1
45%
(
29 of
65)
1st Serve Won
34%
(
11 of
32)
44%
(
7 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
6 of
21)
73%
(
8 of
11)
Break Points Won
47%
(
7 of
15)
56%
(
45 of
81)
Rtn Points Won
68%
(
36 of
53)
72
Total Points Won
62
|
6-2 4-6 11-9 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Nika Radisic
Player
Jessica Pieri
70%
(
63 of
90)
1st Serve %
76%
(
74 of
98)
-
Aces
-
1
Double Faults
2
52%
(
33 of
63)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
42 of
74)
59%
(
16 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
63%
(
15 of
24)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
60%
(
6 of
10)
46%
(
41 of
90)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
41 of
98)
90
Total Points Won
98
|
6-4 1-6 7-6(6) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Nika Radisic
Player
Lilli Tagger
66%
(
46 of
70)
1st Serve %
53%
(
40 of
76)
-
Aces
-
0
Double Faults
3
67%
(
31 of
46)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
24 of
40)
67%
(
16 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
64%
(
23 of
36)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
33%
(
23 of
70)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
29 of
76)
76
Total Points Won
70
|
6-3 7-6(11) | H2H | ||
view more
Lilli Tagger Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R2 |
Stats
Laura Hietaranta
Player
Lilli Tagger
63%
(
38 of
60)
1st Serve %
56%
(
25 of
45)
-
Aces
-
4
Double Faults
4
74%
(
28 of
38)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
13 of
25)
36%
(
8 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
7 of
20)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
40%
(
24 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
25 of
45)
61
Total Points Won
44
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Lilli Tagger
Player
Aneta Kladivova
58%
(
60 of
103)
1st Serve %
68%
(
67 of
99)
7
Aces
0
6
Double Faults
5
57%
(
34 of
60)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
36 of
67)
49%
(
21 of
43)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
14 of
32)
75%
(
9 of
12)
Break Points Won
57%
(
8 of
14)
47%
(
48 of
103)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
49 of
99)
104
Total Points Won
98
|
7-5 5-7 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Nika Radisic
Player
Lilli Tagger
66%
(
46 of
70)
1st Serve %
53%
(
40 of
76)
-
Aces
-
0
Double Faults
3
67%
(
31 of
46)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
24 of
40)
67%
(
16 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
64%
(
23 of
36)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
33%
(
23 of
70)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
29 of
76)
76
Total Points Won
70
|
6-3 7-6(11) | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Boyoung Jeong
Player
Lilli Tagger
60%
(
34 of
57)
1st Serve %
52%
(
33 of
64)
0
Aces
1
6
Double Faults
2
76%
(
26 of
34)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
20 of
33)
30%
(
7 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
13 of
31)
33%
(
3 of
9)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
42%
(
24 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
31 of
64)
64
Total Points Won
57
|
2-6 6-3 10-3 | H2H | ||
| Q2 | 6-2 6-4 | H2H | |||
| R1 |
Stats
Karola Patricia Bejenaru
Player
Lilli Tagger
83%
(
33 of
40)
1st Serve %
64%
(
37 of
58)
3
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
2
76%
(
25 of
33)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
23 of
37)
57%
(
4 of
7)
2nd Serve Won
19%
(
4 of
21)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
28%
(
11 of
40)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
31 of
58)
60
Total Points Won
38
|
6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Mariia Tkacheva
Player
Lilli Tagger
65%
(
41 of
63)
1st Serve %
80%
(
53 of
66)
2
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
5
61%
(
25 of
41)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
32 of
53)
73%
(
16 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
23%
(
3 of
13)
33%
(
4 of
12)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
35%
(
22 of
63)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
31 of
66)
72
Total Points Won
57
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Lilli Tagger
Player
Zuzanna Pawlikowska
77%
(
43 of
56)
1st Serve %
59%
(
33 of
56)
2
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
5
72%
(
31 of
43)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
19 of
33)
46%
(
6 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
11 of
23)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
34%
(
19 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
26 of
56)
63
Total Points Won
49
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Lilli Tagger
Player
Chanel Janssen
87%
(
39 of
45)
1st Serve %
61%
(
34 of
56)
1
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
5
74%
(
29 of
39)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
17 of
34)
83%
(
5 of
6)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
11 of
22)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
24%
(
11 of
45)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
28 of
56)
62
Total Points Won
39
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q2 | 6-4 6-3 | H2H | |||
view more
Radisic Vs Tagger Prediction H2H Images To Share
More tennis photos of Radisic are available here and Tagger photos here.
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
